ÎÜñ|‹ø\/\/ñ [ÐëÞrëçã†ëð]'s Blog

Amit Bahree's insight into stuff...

News

And God said "Let there be light". But then the program crashed because he was trying to access the 'light' property of a NULL universe pointer.

blog roll

calendar

intersting finds

reading

techy finds

Class Designer in Visual Studio 2005 will not support UML

As Ramesh writes in an old post, the Class Designer is not a UML tool but uses the notation. He goes on to say the prime audience for this tool is the Developer then what do the Architects use? Is there a different version? I personally am a bit cheesed off by this. I love UML and have used it extensively and know the value (and pains) it can bring, like with everything else there are pros and cons. Like I said in mu comment, what is Microsoft's issue in supporting UML? Is it more politics since Rational was bought by IBM or is there some other “real” reason?

I work for a large Systems Integrator and we are also one of the largest global MS partners. A lot of the clients I am involved with have almost every technology/platform running somewhere on their network and a very small percentage are only Microsoft. So, if this is something proprietary which I as an Architect cannot "integrate" with other pieces of a complex enterprise application that maybe running on J2EE then why would I want to use this?

What happened to all the “No Application is an Island” push? Was it only a marketing ploy? The other question is, Rational (or now IBM) will be improving Rose/XDE to counter Microsoft's threat to their dominance in this market, and if that does support UML then why would I not use that?

Thoughts?

Comments

Amit Bahree said:

Solemn article. It make me lost in thoughts.
# January 28, 2006 4:13 AM

Amit Bahree said:

Solemn article. It make me lost in thoughts.
# January 28, 2006 4:13 AM

Amit Bahree said:

Solemn article. It make me lost in thoughts.
# January 28, 2006 9:17 AM