ÎÜñ|‹ø\/\/ñ [ÐëÞrëçã†ëð]'s Blog

Amit Bahree's insight into stuff...

News

And God said "Let there be light". But then the program crashed because he was trying to access the 'light' property of a NULL universe pointer.

blog roll

calendar

intersting finds

reading

techy finds

Writely.com - Google's answer to Word

Thanks to my colleague Rick Pollak for pointing this out.

Seems like Google has released Writely.com which is their answer to Word. Registration is open, and you can sign up. I used my Google account and got a confirmation email - however I was able to use the site before I confirmed.

My first experience was not good - as IE had crashed - well it was running at almost 100% CPU and eating all the resources (click the image to see details). Which meant at the end of the day I could not kill that process and I had to restart the machine. But, since I am running IE 7 (Beta 3), I am not sure if there is an issue with IE itself or if the problem is with writely.

I have not used this for a long time, so these are only the first impressions and so far I am more impressed with the collaboration tools than the editor itself. It has all the basic things you would expect - fonts, spellcheck, etc. There are also other a little more advanced features such as the ability to insert comments, manage bookmarks, table and image support. The image can be a maximum of 2mb in size.

 The collaboration features seems to be quite impressive and it would be interesting when MOSS 2007 ships, what impact would it have on SharePoint 2007. I guess it is safe to say that almost all Enterprises will not be using this (you won't want your document out there on someone else's server now would you?). But, for most of us this probably is not too much of an issue. I know my Dad won't have an issue for example. Also, the revisions is interesting - I have not used this. But it seems to be promising and might have helped in the WCF book I have been writing. All the back and forth between myself and the TE's (Technical Editors).

The File > Save As menu is also interesting. As you can see as it allows one to save the document in a number of formats that you would expect such as HTML, Word, OpenOffice, PDF. And in a few that you won't expect such as a RSS feed.

You can also tag the various documents (quite similar to the way you can to blog posts and photographs), and I can see the value in having something like that. This is of course similar to something that will also be in Vista.

Also you can directly publish to you blog. The blogs it supports "out of the box" are blogger.com, blogharbor.com, blogware.com, livejournal.com, squarespaces.com, wordpress.com. But fear not, if whatever blogging thing you use, you can use it as long as it supports one of the following API's: Blogger API, MetaWeblog API or MovableType API.

If security of your document is important, then you will be glad to know they say they take security very seriously. Here is what they have to say about it, about how secure are the documents.

Very! We take security very seriously. A layered security architecture ensures that only people you authorize can view or modify a document.

Of course all this free. You can take a tour here and find out more details here and sign up for this here. I am excited about this, mainly because so many people I know do not have the budget to spend on the likes of Microsoft Office, and OpenOffice is something also a bit of an overkill or just too much hassle to download and install. So, as long as you have a stable and fast Internet connection this might just be a winner.

Having said that, I  personally will not be saving any information that is important to me on their servers as I am a bit paranoid. Also the fact I already have licence's for Microsoft Office is also a factor.

One question that does remain, would Adobe go after google now and ask them to remove the save as PDF functionality from this as they have rumored to have forces Microsoft in for Office 2007?

Posted: Aug 19 2006, 11:41 PM by Amit Bahree | with 78 comment(s)
Filed under:

Comments

Anonymous Crowbar said:

hello

# August 19, 2006 6:52 PM

Mike said:

You have licenses for Microsoft Office, not "licence's for Microsoft Office".  Learn to write.

# August 19, 2006 7:37 PM

Nat said:

PDF is an open format, not exclusive to Adobe.

# August 19, 2006 7:56 PM

Nick said:

"You have licenses for Microsoft Office, not "licence's for Microsoft Office".  Learn to write."

LOL, someone could lighten up a little.

# August 19, 2006 7:58 PM

Nick said:

"You have licenses for Microsoft Office, not "licence's for Microsoft Office".  Learn to write."

LOL, someone could lighten up a little.

# August 19, 2006 7:58 PM

James said:

I just signed up with my GMail account. Sweet.

The one problem that I have right now is that I cannot use my Microsoft Word templates. (For instance, I want my formatting with the date and title the same for every document)

Thanks for introducing me to this cool new service!

# August 19, 2006 8:19 PM

Karl said:

MIKE y dont u get a fucking life instead of correcting other people?

# August 19, 2006 8:23 PM

your mom said:

You had to restart your machine because of an app crashing? Must suck to have to use windows.

# August 19, 2006 8:33 PM

your daddy said:

Right as opposed to rebuilding a kernel....

# August 19, 2006 8:38 PM

Aaron Krill said:

I've been using Writely for months now, its pretty useful. I don't think it supports columns though, which sucks immensely.

# August 19, 2006 8:47 PM

Rock said:

You don't have to rebuild a kernel on a Mac!

BTW this writely.com doesn't work on a Mac in Safari.

I am glad to see this though, MS word is awesome but it can defintely improve and needs some competition.

# August 19, 2006 8:52 PM

stone said:

Good thing google doesn't put all of their eggs in one basket because it will be a long time before people feel comfortable storing their documents remotely (even though they already do so with email)

# August 19, 2006 9:04 PM

Anonymous Crowbat said:

@Mike

learn to differentiate between american and queens english .. his only mistake was the apostrophe in "licence's" (which should have been "licences").

# August 19, 2006 9:19 PM

Esteban said:

None

# August 19, 2006 9:36 PM

Anil said:

Mike go f**k yourself!!!

Excellent article ...keep it up.

# August 19, 2006 9:39 PM

yo mismo said:

I just tried with firefox and it works pretty well.

No performance issues and very little processor usage, even when I'm using an old P3 500Mhz laptop.

Not as good as word but 100 times better value

# August 19, 2006 10:00 PM

KloroFormd said:

I just tried with Firefox also on an IBM T42p, in Firefox. 1.5 GHz Pentium M, 512 RAM.  Averages about 7% processor usage once it's loaded.  It does hit 100% for about 7 seconds or so.  After that, it does great.

# August 19, 2006 10:06 PM

Eddie said:

WoW, just WoW

# August 19, 2006 10:31 PM

Dave said:

Worked fine for me in FireFox..only 3% resources, and I'm using a P3 866 Desktop.

Doesn't seem to work with Opera, though (version 9) - gave an "unsupported browser" error.

# August 19, 2006 10:34 PM

HowToSpell said:

"Also you can directly publish to you blog" That's "your blog".

# August 19, 2006 10:37 PM

stupid webapps said:

why use javascript to implement a word processor? google is trying to push the limit too far and it's as pathetic as using your bald head to *** a ***

# August 19, 2006 11:12 PM

Roland Orre said:

The edit mode stole my Ctrl-K key (kill-to-end-of-line), but it works in html mode.

Bad thing if they enforces keys like that, rest of my basic editing keys worked though. I have similar problems with gmail rich mode, why I don't use that.

# August 19, 2006 11:13 PM

Get over it said:

Do you realize how much java is used on the web??  How about using java for mouse over effect for pathetic?  At least they aren't trying to make a web-based os with java (youos.com).  At least, not yet.

# August 19, 2006 11:36 PM

zooplah said:

You don't have to rebuild the kernel in Linux either.  You have the freedom to do so, but you don't have to.  I guess he thinks that freedom is a bad thing.  Must be a Bush supporter :).

# August 19, 2006 11:42 PM

wisehippo said:

Its simple use the service if u don't have money to pay for MS office and make their share holders wealthier else use google. Remember it your decision finally no one can tell you what to do if someone tries it ask them to go fly kite.

# August 20, 2006 12:16 AM

Not Mike said:

Mike is right.

# August 20, 2006 12:16 AM

grunt said:

More to the point you should be at least aware that google is moving towards a place where you use them for everything. (Even if it is early days in this plan). This should worry you.

A note to the articles author. "It's too much hassle to download and install OpenOffice." You are getting seriously lazy if this is true. You should take your freedom a little more seriously.

# August 20, 2006 12:21 AM

Holden said:

@Get over it: Javascript is not Java. All they have in common are the first four letters.

# August 20, 2006 12:24 AM

Profanity User said:

This **** blog censors too much of the **** words I want to say. Like when I say I want to **** you up the *** using a *****. I mean I wrote that on my grandma's Xmas card. It's not that bad you know.

**** the ****** who made it like that!

PS I am ***

# August 20, 2006 12:31 AM

Jimbo said:

wow, its been so long since ive played hungry hungry hippos.

# August 20, 2006 1:20 AM

zn said:

Seem like Firefox working nicely:

http://hup.hu/node/28608

# August 20, 2006 1:54 AM

RC said:

There is nothing wrong with pointing out language errors. In fact, given the propensity for Americans to get even US English wrong, I would have thought you would welcome a little education.

# August 20, 2006 2:23 AM

Root said:

Grunt, isn't there logically two sides of that coin?

For me it's a good thing that I can use the for a lot, still being in my browser (portability without computer, etc, etc) - i.e. search, blog, mail, chat, word, spreadsheets et al.

It can p o t e n t i a l l y be a bad thing if they decide to use this position in a way that we - the users - don't like. For instance, if they lock us in with proprietary formats and the likes.

But right now the whole basis of their strategy is the opposite, because in many ways they are trying to be an alternative to MS (search, chat, Word, spreadsheets, etc). And if they tried to be l i k e MS in strategy as well, they wouldn't be an alternative any more.

In other words, being a place for 'everything' isn't automatically bad just because we have seen other players using that position in a bad way. Instead, that position can also be used to create something very convenient for the user.

Of course, we should all be wary and look for any signs of 'bad'. But right now it would be completely counterproductive to Google's business model and strategy to use it in a 'bad' way.

Of course, that could change.  

# August 20, 2006 2:54 AM

Michael said:

you said the CPU usage went crazy? I think your problem is a virus called IE7. I recommend that you start using Firefox :)

# August 20, 2006 3:16 AM

Jerre said:

"My first experience was not good - as IE had crashed"

What kind of N(.)(.)B uses IE????!!

# August 20, 2006 3:57 AM

William H. Gates III said:

Windoze: Just Say No™

# August 20, 2006 5:02 AM

THat said:

@Holden: Javascript is not Java.

True, javascript was just marketing name. BUt have you looked at Googles Web Toolkit? Essentially they write the application in Java, then a translater generates Javascript that runs inthe browser. That's why there's such a long startup with their web apps, essentially they're doing the old applet/activeX thing in javascript.

http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/

# August 20, 2006 6:22 AM

Thomas said:

"My first experience was not good - as IE had crashed - well it was running at almost 100% CPU and eating all the resources (click the image to see details). Which meant at the end of the day I could not kill that process and I had to restart the machine."

Maybe you were just impatient. :)

When you kill an errant process on Windows, it can take some time for it to go away, especially in certain pathological cases (e.g. if in a tight loop making IPCs to a high-priority process). Moreover, if the "friendly" kill is used, the system will first send a close message to the process, so it can clean up after itself, before resorting to an "unfriendly" kill, if the process doesn't respond.

# August 20, 2006 6:27 AM

p said:

"PDF is an open format, not exclusive to Adobe."

That is incorrect.  Adobe created PDF and they have an open license; and they can change the terms at anytime.  In essence; pdf isn't a truely open and free format.

Regards,

P

# August 20, 2006 6:34 AM

cmdrtaco said:

A Word killer? Please. This is hardly a Wordpad killer. Once again the truth about a Google app is highly overstated.

# August 20, 2006 7:36 AM

michael said:

I've been using Zoho Writer while waiting for Writely to open back up again and I just transferred my documents over to Writely. I like the idea of Writely on a larger company's servers but I actually prefer the layout of Zoho Writer for Word Processing. I didn't see options in Writely to change the layout or colors.

We're just using the online word processors for our kids' essays right now. I use Xemacs, NVU and Latex for most of my personal work and Open Office and MS Office for company work (I have two MS Office licenses but have 8 computers at home).

# August 20, 2006 8:35 AM

mrhyd3 said:

I agree w/ cmdrtaco.  How come these ppl hype a basic notepad in a webbrowser?

# August 20, 2006 8:44 AM

Jeff Hamilton said:

I dont' think that Google is trying to kill Word at all. I believe they see word processing (not sure if I'd even call Writely that) as something that needs to be easy to do, accessible wherever you are, flexible in delivery (web, print, blog, rss, etc.). I guess it's a bit the same as Microsoft's new LiveWriter but again livewriter is a desktop app and not a web app. In the end Web apps will really fit some people and perhaps not fit others. For me I've committed to calendar, rss aggregation and email web apps. I'm tinkering with spreadsheets and word processing but the desktop-based apps for those are so good that it will take some time before embracing them.

jrh

# August 20, 2006 8:46 AM

Jonathan Dugan said:

I see another group-editing application for Writely.

So this guy had a few typos and and not-correct english in the post above.  He may be in a hurry, he may be a non-native English speaker, or he may be like me and not take spelling very seriously.  I don't spell well, and I know myself well enough so that it doesn't bother me.  Other people are excellent at spelling and copy editing.

Interestingly - the topic of the post in an online application that does document editing.  Wouldn't it be great if instead of offering corrections in the comments - uf readers could offer correction (tracked changes, deep tags, call them whatever) inside the document, in this case to the above blog posting?  Going through your online writings after many people read and suggested edits would incororate many different people's skills.  Some could add the copy edit stuff, still others might add insight and other viewpoints.

# August 20, 2006 9:09 AM

Debbie Showalter aka The Doby Show said:

Writely is like Martha Stewart; slow and not relevant

# August 20, 2006 9:11 AM

GrammarNotGrammer said:

Mike, you rock dude! The rest of you: LEARN TO F U C K I N' SPELL!

# August 20, 2006 9:12 AM

Yannis said:

I don't understand this obsession with online tools on googles part. Actually I'm quite skeptical about them. I mean we now have gigs and gigs of cheap space on our hard disks. Since most of documents written lay in the commercial/corporate realm where such information is very security sensitive it would make sense to keep it on a users own physical storage. It's neither difficult nor expensive. As for portability whether it's Ram sticks, remote desktop management, or email, it's all here already.

I think that if this trend continues we as users will lose control in the sense that this trend is heading to an operating system located on the manufacturers servers with all programs installed as well as all documents located there. We will end up with nothing but terminals and no control. Sure you'll be able to access it from anywhere, but do you really want corporations to have all your files or all your companies files?

# August 20, 2006 9:20 AM

mj said:

Yeah, calling this a "word killer" is a bit exaggerated.  But, on the other hand, most of those "features" in Word aren't things that normal people hardly ever use.  I'd wager that 90% of all docs written in word, including corporate ones, could equally well have been written in wordpad.  

Word is the #1 cause of "feature creep", and I'd welcome a lightweight alternative that didn't waste my time and space with features that I don't want or need.  In my copy of Word, a one-line "hello, world!" Word doc is 20K, which I think is just hateful!

# August 20, 2006 9:21 AM

billhedrick said:

GNG, you typed a " ' " instead of a " g " in your last entry.

# August 20, 2006 9:22 AM

arn said:

How can you test ojectively a beta web service with a beta browser?

Why did not you use a stable browser? (IE6,FF1)

Anyway, I like your style....

# August 20, 2006 10:51 AM

floppy_d said:

Everyone should check out http://www.abiword.org/. It's free, open source, and much faster than openoffice. They have versions for windows, mac, and linux.

# August 20, 2006 11:31 AM

english said:

for all the americans out there: http://www.answers.com/licence&r=67

# August 20, 2006 12:22 PM

r said:

Stopped reading when I got to "as IE had crashed".

IE? What kind of a person uses IE?:)))

# August 20, 2006 12:33 PM

alpha2zee said:

The English in this posting is indeed lousy, written lazily. Couldn't these, for example, be reworded for good?

'Seems like Google has released Writely.com which is their answer to Word.'

'There are also other a little more advanced features ...'

Language is the medium for conveying your thoughts. Don't muddy it this way, desi!

# August 20, 2006 1:25 PM

Anon_wee said:

"

@Mike

learn to differentiate between american and queens english .. his only mistake was the apostrophe in "licence's" (which should have been "licences").

"

Actually, it would be licenses, but that has nothing to do with the overall quality of this otherwise nicely written article!

Cheers!

# August 20, 2006 1:50 PM

Misty said:

Hosted word processor, save docs to your hard drive and/or on their servers, and runs great on my P.O.S. Gateway (which can't run two messengers at once without crashing)... sound great to me.

And I speak to many people through my type of work who love apps hosted online... collaborate on a doc? How cool!?

PS... not giving a rats boot-ay if my grammar or spelling is correct. I'm off the clock!

# August 20, 2006 3:21 PM

anon said:

Hi, mum!

# August 20, 2006 3:41 PM

k said:

this website is pretty terrible

# August 20, 2006 3:54 PM

Andy said:

get neooffice, lol

# August 20, 2006 5:19 PM

akki said:

google itself is a hyped company .. sucks in general !!

# August 20, 2006 9:27 PM

matt said:

The problem i think is you are usinf IE!!! :)

# August 20, 2006 10:55 PM

Luke said:

I just dont see the point in moving everything to the browser. From a developer point of view:

- Coding is ugly

- managment of files is more difficult

- assumes presence of webserver + administrator

- assumes presence of internet connection

- have to addin support for specific browsers as they all behave somewhat differently

- Did I say coding is ugly?

- A word processor does not fit the client/server model

- etc

I'm so sick of stupid browser apps...

# August 21, 2006 12:33 AM

Editor said:

I'm thinking this will work for me because a friend and I are starting an online magazine (http://49-reasons.com); and using this I can send the email address to a contributor, edit or suggest changes and send it back.

At least it will segregate the submissions instead filling up my inbox, and I don't have to mess around with attachments.

The Google Gorilla on the march.

Haha

# August 21, 2006 12:36 AM

Mark Westwood said:

It's simple really:

queens english -- english as she is spoke in Queens, so some variant of US English

queen's english -- english as spoke by a queen, the queen or queens

Dose that clarify maters ?

Mark

# August 21, 2006 1:02 AM

derek said:

no red squiggly line. You have to have the red squiggly line now.

# August 21, 2006 1:50 AM

Grate spelar said:

Mike u shud realy lie-ten up, a** hole

# August 21, 2006 2:42 AM

badevlad said:

It is something revolutionary!

One day we will boot our computers from Google. Then we will launch the GoogleWord and type. Then we will watch GoogleTV and then go to the GoogleShop for products for dinner.

# August 21, 2006 6:21 AM

Senor Squiid said:

Jesus, you all sucks.

Who cares whether he uses IE, Firefox, Opera, or some wonky bizarro all text web viewer? So IE sucks and crashed, then don't use IE for this program, or at least not IE7 anyways. He cna use whatever damned browser he pleases.

So what his grammar may not be perfect, and there are some poorly written sentences? The pointof this article is to convey information about Google's new service, not rewrite fucking Kafka.

Assholes like you make this industry a very unhappy place.

# August 21, 2006 6:22 AM

Moth-to-the-Flame said:

----- Begin Flame ----

FLAME

You people need to ligthen up, and get a girlfriend/boyfriend instead of wasting your time flaming each other about a text edit application!

----- End Flame ------

---- Comment

---- Oh and I am not going to check this blog again to see if anyone

---- comments... I have better thigs to do with my time.

# August 21, 2006 9:44 AM

Alex said:

Actually Mark, to signify English as spoken by Queens(plural) the apostrophe would follow the s: Queens' English. English as spoken a or The Queen (Singular) would be denoted by an apostrophe before the s: Queen's English.

Senor Squid, as you rightly said the point of the article is to convey a point. However, the point may get lost if proper grammar and punctuation are not used. Punctuation is "a courtesy designed to help readers to understand a story without stumbling". I concede that perfect English is not necessary when making a quite comment on an article, but the article itself should have proper grammar and punctuation.

All of that aside the article was of a high standard (punctuation aside) and informative. Writely is a interesting idea in terms of school children; MS Office is expensive and is not normally bundled with new PCs, Writely (and its competitors) offers students a free way to not only word processor their work but also to access it from anywhere. This in turn might also see a (small) reduction in piracy.

Alex

PS

Before anyone posts to correct my spelling or grammar bare in mind that I'm English and using The Queen's and as such some conventions of punctuation, grammar and spelling will be different to US English.

# August 21, 2006 11:40 AM

Leroy_2000 said:

Bad idea to use a version of IE that is still in beta. Thats like road testing a car with tires that aren't up to the car's specifications. "Such an IDIOT!"

# August 22, 2006 10:11 AM

josh said:

It is incredibly irresponsible to not only test, but then review a web based program on a beta browser alone.  It would be fine to test it on IE7 as an experiment at the end of the review, but not solely on a BETA browser.  COME ON!  That's incredibly stupid.

I agree that writely is less of a solution to word processing than some people would like to think.

# August 22, 2006 12:03 PM

aschoff_nodule said:

I wonder what is the maximum upload size all the documents together. That is not mentioned anywhere in the FAQs.

# August 26, 2006 9:28 AM

colleges and educational institutes in punjab said:

i am trying it. but i could not find rss option there.

# September 3, 2006 1:33 AM

Soft Review » Writely.com - Google’s answer to Word said:

Pingback from  Soft Review    » Writely.com - Google’s answer to Word

# November 6, 2007 7:39 AM

Wordprocessing - The Latest 'Online' App - Clueless Wonder said:

Pingback from  Wordprocessing - The Latest 'Online' App - Clueless Wonder

# February 27, 2009 8:03 PM

Wordprocessing - The Latest 'Online' App - Clueless Wonder said:

Pingback from  Wordprocessing - The Latest 'Online' App - Clueless Wonder

# February 27, 2009 8:03 PM

Websites tagged "writely" on Postsaver said:

Pingback from  Websites tagged "writely" on Postsaver

# July 1, 2009 8:33 PM